NVBU vs. MARU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NVBU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF) and MARU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from AllianzIM. NVBU is actively managed, while MARU is passively managed. Over the past year, NVBU returned 20.67% vs 19.61% for MARU. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

NVBU vs. MARU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVBU having a 7.60% return and MARU slightly higher at 7.88%.

NVBU

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 6.96%
• 1Y: 20.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MARU

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVBU vs. MARU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVBU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF	7.60%	13.60%
MARU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF	7.88%	12.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NVBU and MARU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	0.98

The correlation between NVBU and MARU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVBU vs. MARU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVBU

NVBU Risk / Return Rank: 74
NVBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
NVBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NVBU Omega Ratio Rank: 71
NVBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NVBU Martin Ratio Rank: 80

MARU

MARU Risk / Return Rank: 61
MARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MARU Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVBU vs. MARU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVBU	MARU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.01	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	2.77	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.36	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	3.00	+0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.42	11.51	+3.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVBU vs. MARU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBU Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the MARU Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBU and MARU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVBU	MARU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	2.01	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	1.43	-0.10

Drawdowns

NVBU vs. MARU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBU drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, which is greater than MARU's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBU and MARU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVBU	MARU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.97%	-8.50%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.38%	-6.56%	+1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-0.52%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-1.34%	-0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	1.71%	-0.37%

Volatility

NVBU vs. MARU - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) have volatilities of 2.48% and 2.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVBU	MARU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.48%	2.44%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.13%	7.47%	-1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.08%	9.81%	-0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.05%	11.78%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.05%	11.78%	-0.73%

NVBU vs. MARU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVBU and MARU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

NVBU vs. MARU - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVBU nor MARU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVBU and MARU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, NVBU and MARU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NVBU or MARU?

NVBU has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to MARU (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBU dropped -11.97% vs MARU's -8.50%.

Which ETF is better, NVBU or MARU?

On 1-year performance, NVBU leads with 20.67% vs 19.61% for MARU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVBU or MARU?

Over the 1-year period, NVBU has performed better with a 20.67% return vs 19.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVBU or MARU?

NVBU and MARU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVBU or MARU?

NVBU and MARU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.