PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVBU vs. OCTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVBU vs. OCTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Oct ETF (OCTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVBU having a 7.60% return and OCTU slightly higher at 7.96%.


NVBU

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.02%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.96%
1Y
20.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTU

1D
-0.43%
1M
4.27%
YTD
7.96%
6M
7.66%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVBU vs. OCTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVBU and OCTU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024

0.98

The correlation between NVBU and OCTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVBU vs. OCTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVBU
NVBU Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NVBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVBU Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVBU Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTU
OCTU Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
OCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVBU vs. OCTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Oct ETF (OCTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVBUOCTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

3.42

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.42

14.31

+1.11

NVBU vs. OCTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBU Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the OCTU Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBU and OCTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVBUOCTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.33

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Drawdowns

NVBU vs. OCTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBU drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, which is greater than OCTU's maximum drawdown of -11.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBU and OCTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVBUOCTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.97%

-11.24%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

-5.92%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.43%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-1.68%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

1.41%

-0.07%

Volatility

NVBU vs. OCTU - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Oct ETF (OCTU) have volatilities of 2.48% and 2.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVBUOCTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

2.44%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.13%

6.22%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.08%

8.69%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.05%

10.39%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.05%

10.39%

+0.66%

NVBU vs. OCTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVBU and OCTU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

NVBU vs. OCTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVBU nor OCTU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, NVBU and OCTU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NVBU has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to OCTU (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBU dropped -11.97% vs OCTU's -11.24%.

On 1-year performance, NVBU leads with 20.67% vs 20.19% for OCTU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVBU has performed better with a 20.67% return vs 20.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVBU and OCTU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

NVBU and OCTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

OCTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVBU and OCTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer