PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVBU vs. DECU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVBU vs. DECU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVBU having a 8.19% return and DECU slightly higher at 8.21%.


NVBU

1D
0.11%
1M
4.17%
YTD
8.19%
6M
8.30%
1Y
21.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DECU

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.11%
YTD
8.21%
6M
8.39%
1Y
19.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVBU vs. DECU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVBU and DECU is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024

0.96

The correlation between NVBU and DECU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVBU vs. DECU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVBU
NVBU Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVBU Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NVBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVBU Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DECU
DECU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVBU vs. DECU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVBUDECUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.25

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

3.11

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

3.52

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.38

13.10

+3.28

NVBU vs. DECU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBU Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the DECU Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBU and DECU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVBUDECUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.25

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

1.13

+0.24

Drawdowns

NVBU vs. DECU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBU drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, which is greater than DECU's maximum drawdown of -10.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBU and DECU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVBUDECUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.97%

-10.66%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

-5.65%

+0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-1.73%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

1.52%

-0.18%

Volatility

NVBU vs. DECU - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) at 2.28%. This indicates that NVBU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DECU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVBUDECUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

2.28%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.13%

6.12%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

8.80%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.05%

10.58%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.05%

10.58%

+0.47%

NVBU vs. DECU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVBU and DECU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

NVBU vs. DECU - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVBU nor DECU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, NVBU and DECU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NVBU has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to DECU (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBU dropped -11.97% vs DECU's -10.66%.

On 1-year performance, NVBU leads with 21.83% vs 19.72% for DECU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, DECU has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVBU has performed better with a 21.83% return vs 19.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVBU and DECU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

NVBU and DECU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NVBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVBU and DECU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer