PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVBU vs. DECU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVBU vs. DECU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVBU having a 6.15% return and DECU slightly higher at 6.39%.


NVBU

1D
0.69%
1M
0.05%
6M
5.22%
YTD
6.15%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%

DECU

1D
0.73%
1M
0.14%
6M
5.54%
YTD
6.39%
1Y
14.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$207.23K$140.48K$1.36M
$100.45K$148.35K$131.01K

NVBU vs. DECU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVBU and DECU is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024

0.97

The correlation between NVBU and DECU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVBU vs. DECU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVBU
NVBU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NVBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVBU Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NVBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVBU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DECU
DECU Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVBU vs. DECU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVBUDECUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.31

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

7.55

+1.27

NVBU vs. DECU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBU Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the DECU Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBU and DECU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVBU vs. DECU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBU drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, which is greater than DECU's maximum drawdown of -10.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBU and DECU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVBUDECUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.97%

-10.66%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

-5.65%

+0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-1.72%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-1.74%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.73%

-0.15%

Volatility

NVBU vs. DECU - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVBUDECUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.93%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

7.44%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.89%

9.91%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.10%

10.80%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.10%

10.80%

+0.30%

NVBU vs. DECU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVBU and DECU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

NVBU vs. DECU - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVBU nor DECU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, NVBU and DECU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DECU has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to NVBU (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBU dropped -11.97% vs DECU's -10.66%.

On 1-year performance, NVBU leads with 15.26% vs 14.28% for DECU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVBU has performed better with a 15.26% return vs 14.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVBU and DECU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

NVBU and DECU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NVBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVBU and DECU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer