PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMV vs. RDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMV vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMV achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 11.95% return.


NUMV

1D
-0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.74%
6M
11.20%
1Y
23.74%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*

RDIV

1D
-1.30%
1M
2.29%
YTD
11.95%
6M
11.03%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMV vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
9.74%14.05%12.31%8.43%-14.97%31.15%0.91%29.81%-11.91%14.70%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
11.95%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMV and RDIV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.82

The correlation between NUMV and RDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NUMV vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUMV
RDIV

Financial Services

18.6%
18.0%

Technology

14.8%
5.1%

Industrials

13.9%

-

Real Estate

8.6%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
15.9%

Healthcare

8.2%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
9.5%

Utilities

6.8%
6.4%

Communication Services

5.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.6%
0.5%

Energy

2.6%
28.8%

Financial Services

NUMV
18.6%
RDIV
18.0%

Technology

NUMV
14.8%
RDIV
5.1%

Industrials

NUMV
13.9%
RDIV

-

Real Estate

NUMV
8.6%
RDIV
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

NUMV
8.3%
RDIV
15.9%

Healthcare

NUMV
8.2%
RDIV
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NUMV
8.1%
RDIV
9.5%

Utilities

NUMV
6.8%
RDIV
6.4%

Communication Services

NUMV
5.5%
RDIV

-

Basic Materials

NUMV
4.6%
RDIV
0.5%

Energy

NUMV
2.6%
RDIV
28.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMV vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMV
NUMV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NUMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMV vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMVRDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

5.61

-2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

16.50

-6.13

NUMV vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the RDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMV and RDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMVRDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.06

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.58

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.55

-0.10

Drawdowns

NUMV vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMV drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMV and RDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMVRDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-49.97%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-4.84%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-17.91%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.71%

-24.89%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-1.65%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-5.86%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.65%

+0.64%

Volatility

NUMV vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) is 2.97%, while Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that NUMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMVRDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

3.46%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

8.62%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

13.23%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

17.53%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

21.89%

-2.12%

NUMV vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMV vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

NUMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than RDIV's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.53%1.81%2.20%5.78%6.62%1.38%2.40%4.01%0.83%0.00%0.00%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.66%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMV and RDIV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDIV has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to NUMV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMV dropped -43.46% vs RDIV's -49.97%.

On 5-year performance, RDIV leads with 10.04% vs 6.55% for NUMV. On fees, NUMV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, NUMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 10.04% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 1.40% for NUMV.

NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for NUMV and 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMV and RDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer