PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMV vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMV vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMV achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -2.36% return.


NUMV

1D
0.19%
1M
1.40%
YTD
9.23%
6M
8.54%
1Y
21.81%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*

FDIS

1D
-0.98%
1M
-2.85%
YTD
-2.36%
6M
-4.54%
1Y
8.08%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
13.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMV vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
9.23%14.05%12.31%8.43%-14.97%31.15%0.91%29.81%-11.91%14.70%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-2.36%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMV and FDIS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016

0.70

The correlation between NUMV and FDIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NUMV vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUMV
FDIS

Financial Services

18.0%
0.1%

Technology

17.3%
1.0%

Industrials

12.9%
0.9%

Real Estate

8.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
96.7%

Utilities

6.3%

-

Communication Services

5.4%
0.3%

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Energy

2.3%

-

Financial Services

NUMV
18.0%
FDIS
0.1%

Technology

NUMV
17.3%
FDIS
1.0%

Industrials

NUMV
12.9%
FDIS
0.9%

Real Estate

NUMV
8.6%
FDIS
0.1%

Healthcare

NUMV
8.4%
FDIS
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

NUMV
8.1%
FDIS
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NUMV
7.9%
FDIS
96.7%

Utilities

NUMV
6.3%
FDIS

-

Communication Services

NUMV
5.4%
FDIS
0.3%

Basic Materials

NUMV
4.7%
FDIS

-

Energy

NUMV
2.3%
FDIS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMV vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMV
NUMV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NUMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMV vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUMVFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.09

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

0.52

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

1.60

+7.89

NUMV vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMV and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUMV vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMV drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMV and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMVFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-39.16%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-15.50%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-27.43%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.71%

-39.16%

+13.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-6.85%

+5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-7.49%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

5.07%

-2.77%

Volatility

NUMV vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) is 3.49%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that NUMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMVFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

6.34%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

13.82%

-4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

18.75%

-6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

23.99%

-6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

22.33%

-2.60%

NUMV vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMV vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

NUMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than FDIS's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.75%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.53%1.81%2.20%5.78%6.62%1.38%2.40%4.01%0.83%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMV and FDIS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to NUMV (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMV dropped -43.46% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 5-year performance, NUMV leads with 7.06% vs 5.16% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, NUMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUMV has performed better with a 7.06% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for NUMV.

NUMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.75% for FDIS.

NUMV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for NUMV and 0.08% for FDIS.

NUMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMV and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer