PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMV vs. NUEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMV vs. NUEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMV achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than NUEM's 19.14% return.


NUMV

1D
-0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.74%
6M
11.20%
1Y
23.74%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*

NUEM

1D
-1.30%
1M
3.53%
YTD
19.14%
6M
21.09%
1Y
42.42%
3Y*
19.13%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMV vs. NUEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
9.74%14.05%12.31%8.43%-14.97%31.15%0.91%29.81%-11.91%9.01%
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
19.14%27.12%9.73%8.57%-19.74%-1.08%24.09%16.67%-17.26%18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMV and NUEM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.53

The correlation between NUMV and NUEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUMV vs. NUEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUMV
NUEM

Financial Services

18.6%
18.2%

Technology

14.8%
31.5%

Industrials

13.9%
11.9%

Real Estate

8.6%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
1.6%

Healthcare

8.2%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
11.3%

Utilities

6.8%
1.9%

Communication Services

5.5%
8.2%

Basic Materials

4.6%
8.5%

Energy

2.6%
3.3%

Financial Services

NUMV
18.6%
NUEM
18.2%

Technology

NUMV
14.8%
NUEM
31.5%

Industrials

NUMV
13.9%
NUEM
11.9%

Real Estate

NUMV
8.6%
NUEM
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

NUMV
8.3%
NUEM
1.6%

Healthcare

NUMV
8.2%
NUEM
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

NUMV
8.1%
NUEM
11.3%

Utilities

NUMV
6.8%
NUEM
1.9%

Communication Services

NUMV
5.5%
NUEM
8.2%

Basic Materials

NUMV
4.6%
NUEM
8.5%

Energy

NUMV
2.6%
NUEM
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMV vs. NUEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMV
NUMV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NUMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NUEM
NUEM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NUEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NUEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMV vs. NUEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMVNUEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.69

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

12.95

-2.58

NUMV vs. NUEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the NUEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMV and NUEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMVNUEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.28

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.27

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.41

+0.04

Drawdowns

NUMV vs. NUEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMV drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, which is greater than NUEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMV and NUEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMVNUEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-39.48%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-11.56%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-17.58%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.71%

-38.10%

+12.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-1.30%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-15.02%

+8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

3.28%

-0.99%

Volatility

NUMV vs. NUEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) is 2.97%, while Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that NUMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMVNUEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

6.76%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

15.83%

-6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

18.68%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

19.72%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

20.18%

-0.41%

NUMV vs. NUEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than NUEM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMV vs. NUEM - Dividend Comparison

NUMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than NUEM's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.00%3.58%1.95%2.37%1.90%2.45%1.26%1.98%2.05%0.62%
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.53%1.81%2.20%5.78%6.62%1.38%2.40%4.01%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMV and NUEM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUEM has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to NUMV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMV dropped -43.46% vs NUEM's -39.48%.

On 5-year performance, NUMV leads with 6.55% vs 5.39% for NUEM. On fees, NUMV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, NUMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUMV has performed better with a 6.55% return vs 5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NUEM.

NUEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.40% for NUMV.

NUMV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while NUEM is Emerging Markets Equities. NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index, while NUEM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for NUMV and 0.35% for NUEM.

NUEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMV and NUEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer