PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULV vs. NULC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULV vs. NULC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NULV having a 13.87% return and NULC slightly higher at 14.17%.


NULV

1D
0.92%
1M
2.54%
YTD
13.87%
6M
14.07%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*

NULC

1D
0.06%
1M
5.15%
YTD
14.17%
6M
14.22%
1Y
26.89%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULV vs. NULC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
13.87%16.31%11.88%7.60%-10.09%23.46%1.87%14.16%
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
14.17%16.29%18.71%22.54%-20.18%25.69%22.51%16.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NULV and NULC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019

0.84

The correlation between NULV and NULC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

NULV vs. NULC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NULV
NULC

Technology

20.1%
36.2%

Financial Services

18.8%
13.4%

Communication Services

13.7%
10.9%

Healthcare

11.6%
8.7%

Industrials

10.2%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
6.0%

Energy

4.1%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
8.0%

Utilities

3.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.7%

Technology

NULV
20.1%
NULC
36.2%

Financial Services

NULV
18.8%
NULC
13.4%

Communication Services

NULV
13.7%
NULC
10.9%

Healthcare

NULV
11.6%
NULC
8.7%

Industrials

NULV
10.2%
NULC
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

NULV
9.2%
NULC
6.0%

Energy

NULV
4.1%
NULC
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NULV
4.0%
NULC
8.0%

Utilities

NULV
3.6%
NULC
2.0%

Real Estate

NULV
2.7%
NULC
2.3%

Basic Materials

NULV
2.3%
NULC
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULV vs. NULC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NULC
NULC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NULC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NULC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULV vs. NULC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULVNULCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.37

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

3.03

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.42

13.04

+3.38

NULV vs. NULC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULV Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the NULC Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULV and NULC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULVNULCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.11

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.68

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.80

-0.19

Drawdowns

NULV vs. NULC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULV drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, which is greater than NULC's maximum drawdown of -34.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULV and NULC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULVNULCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-34.86%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-8.91%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-18.53%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-27.90%

+6.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-6.29%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.07%

-0.34%

Volatility

NULV vs. NULC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) is 2.52%, while Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that NULV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NULC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULVNULCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

3.28%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

9.89%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.68%

12.78%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

16.85%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

19.68%

-2.66%

NULV vs. NULC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than NULC's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NULV vs. NULC - Dividend Comparison

NULV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than NULC's 8.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
8.91%10.17%1.86%1.32%2.37%6.14%4.07%0.77%0.00%0.00%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.44%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULV and NULC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NULC has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to NULV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULV dropped -36.99% vs NULC's -34.86%.

On 5-year performance, NULC leads with 11.42% vs 8.68% for NULV. On fees, NULC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NULC has performed better with a 11.42% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NULV.

NULC has the higher dividend yield at 8.91%, compared with 1.44% for NULV.

NULV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NULC is Large Cap Growth Equities. NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while NULC tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NULV and 0.20% for NULC.

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULV and NULC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer