PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULV vs. IWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULV vs. IWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULV achieves a 12.83% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 7.20% return.


NULV

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.62%
YTD
12.83%
6M
13.15%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*

IWY

1D
-1.41%
1M
5.83%
YTD
7.20%
6M
6.65%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
19.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULV vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
12.83%16.31%11.88%7.60%-10.09%23.46%1.87%27.26%-4.90%15.67%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
7.20%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%36.20%-0.72%31.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NULV and IWY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.61

The correlation between NULV and IWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NULV vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NULV
IWY

Technology

20.1%
54.9%

Financial Services

18.8%
5.6%

Communication Services

13.7%
13.9%

Healthcare

11.6%
6.6%

Industrials

10.2%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
3.0%

Energy

4.1%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
11.4%

Utilities

3.6%
1.1%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.3%

Basic Materials

2.3%
0.3%

Technology

NULV
20.1%
IWY
54.9%

Financial Services

NULV
18.8%
IWY
5.6%

Communication Services

NULV
13.7%
IWY
13.9%

Healthcare

NULV
11.6%
IWY
6.6%

Industrials

NULV
10.2%
IWY
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

NULV
9.2%
IWY
3.0%

Energy

NULV
4.1%
IWY
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

NULV
4.0%
IWY
11.4%

Utilities

NULV
3.6%
IWY
1.1%

Real Estate

NULV
2.7%
IWY
0.3%

Basic Materials

NULV
2.3%
IWY
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULV vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULV vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULVIWYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

1.73

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.62

2.36

+1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.30

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

1.61

+2.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.52

5.26

+10.27

NULV vs. IWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULV Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the IWY Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULV and IWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULVIWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.73

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.77

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.92

-0.32

Drawdowns

NULV vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULV drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULV and IWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULVIWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-32.68%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-16.63%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-23.22%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-32.68%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.82%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-4.75%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

5.09%

-3.36%

Volatility

NULV vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) is 2.55%, while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that NULV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULVIWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

3.69%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.94%

11.65%

-3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

15.54%

-4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

21.48%

-7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

20.97%

-3.95%

NULV vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NULV vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison

NULV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than IWY's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.33%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.45%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULV and IWY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWY has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to NULV (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULV dropped -36.99% vs IWY's -32.68%.

On 5-year performance, IWY leads with 16.45% vs 8.48% for NULV. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWY has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NULV.

NULV has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.33% for IWY.

NULV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NULV and 0.20% for IWY.

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULV and IWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer