PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULV vs. NUEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULV vs. NUEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NULV having a 12.19% return and NUEM slightly higher at 12.28%.


NULV

1D
-1.48%
1M
0.48%
YTD
12.19%
6M
12.09%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*

NUEM

1D
-4.61%
1M
-5.75%
YTD
12.28%
6M
13.23%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULV vs. NUEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
12.19%16.31%11.88%7.60%-10.09%23.46%1.87%27.26%-4.90%8.84%
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
12.28%27.12%9.73%8.57%-19.74%-1.08%24.09%16.67%-17.26%18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between NULV and NUEM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.53

The correlation between NULV and NUEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

NULV vs. NUEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NULV
NUEM

Technology

20.1%
31.5%

Financial Services

18.8%
18.2%

Communication Services

13.7%
8.2%

Healthcare

11.6%
2.9%

Industrials

10.2%
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
1.6%

Energy

4.1%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
11.3%

Utilities

3.6%
1.9%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.7%

Basic Materials

2.3%
8.5%

Technology

NULV
20.1%
NUEM
31.5%

Financial Services

NULV
18.8%
NUEM
18.2%

Communication Services

NULV
13.7%
NUEM
8.2%

Healthcare

NULV
11.6%
NUEM
2.9%

Industrials

NULV
10.2%
NUEM
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

NULV
9.2%
NUEM
1.6%

Energy

NULV
4.1%
NUEM
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

NULV
4.0%
NUEM
11.3%

Utilities

NULV
3.6%
NUEM
1.9%

Real Estate

NULV
2.7%
NUEM
0.7%

Basic Materials

NULV
2.3%
NUEM
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULV vs. NUEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NUEM
NUEM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NUEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NUEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULV vs. NUEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULVNUEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.32

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.77

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.28

9.62

+5.66

NULV vs. NUEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULV Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the NUEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULV and NUEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULVNUEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.66

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.21

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.37

+0.22

Drawdowns

NULV vs. NUEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULV drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, smaller than the maximum NUEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULV and NUEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULVNUEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-39.48%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-11.56%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-17.58%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-38.10%

+16.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-6.98%

+5.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-15.02%

+10.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

3.32%

-1.59%

Volatility

NULV vs. NUEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) is 2.95%, while Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that NULV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULVNUEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

7.93%

-4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

16.61%

-8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

19.28%

-8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.34%

19.82%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

20.23%

-3.21%

NULV vs. NUEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NUEM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NULV vs. NUEM - Dividend Comparison

NULV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than NUEM's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.19%3.58%1.95%2.37%1.90%2.45%1.26%1.98%2.05%0.62%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.46%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULV and NUEM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUEM has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to NULV (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULV dropped -36.99% vs NUEM's -39.48%.

On 5-year performance, NULV leads with 8.35% vs 4.15% for NUEM. On fees, NULV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NULV has performed better with a 8.35% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NUEM.

NUEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 1.46% for NULV.

NULV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NUEM is Emerging Markets Equities. NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while NUEM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NULV and 0.35% for NUEM.

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULV and NUEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer