NULC vs. SGRT
NULC (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. NULC is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NULC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
NULC vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NULC achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
NULC
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 26.94%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NULC vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NULC Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF | 14.11% | 4.73% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NULC and SGRT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NULC vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
NULC
SGRT
NULC vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NULC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NULC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 3.81 | -3.01 |
Drawdowns
NULC vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NULC drawdown since its inception was -34.86%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULC and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NULC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.86% | -17.87% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | 0.00% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -3.11% | -3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | — | — |
Volatility
NULC vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NULC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 33.41% | -20.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 33.41% | -16.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 33.41% | -13.73% |
NULC vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NULC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
NULC vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
NULC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULC Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF | 8.91% | 10.17% | 1.86% | 1.32% | 2.37% | 6.14% | 4.07% | 0.77% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NULC and SGRT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NULC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NULC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
NULC has the higher dividend yield at 8.91%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NULC and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for NULC and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer