PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULC vs. NUMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NULC vs. NUMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NULC vs. NUMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
-3.28%16.29%18.71%22.54%-20.18%25.69%22.51%16.89%
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
-0.84%14.05%12.31%8.43%-14.97%31.15%0.91%12.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULC achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than NUMV's -0.84% return.


NULC

1D
2.71%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
-3.28%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*

NUMV

1D
2.16%
1M
-6.74%
YTD
-0.84%
6M
1.75%
1Y
15.07%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NULC vs. NUMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMV's 0.31% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NULC vs. NUMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULC
NULC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NULC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NULC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NUMV
NUMV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NUMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULC vs. NUMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULCNUMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

0.88

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.35

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.28

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.75

5.51

+1.23

NULC vs. NUMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULC Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the NUMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULC and NUMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULCNUMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.88

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.34

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.40

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between NULC and NUMV is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NULC vs. NUMV - Dividend Comparison

NULC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.51%, more than NUMV's 1.55% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
10.51%10.17%1.86%1.32%2.37%6.14%4.07%0.77%0.00%0.00%
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.55%1.53%1.81%2.20%5.78%6.62%1.38%2.40%4.01%0.83%

Drawdowns

NULC vs. NUMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULC drawdown since its inception was -34.86%, smaller than the maximum NUMV drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULC and NUMV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NULCNUMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.86%

-43.46%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-12.49%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

-25.71%

-2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-6.74%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-6.99%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.90%

-0.37%

Volatility

NULC vs. NUMV - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) at 4.83%. This indicates that NULC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NULCNUMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

4.83%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

9.40%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

17.21%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

17.44%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.83%

19.89%

-0.06%