PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULC vs. NULV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULC vs. NULV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULC achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than NULV's 17.82% return.


NULC

1D
1.94%
1M
4.01%
6M
14.56%
YTD
16.79%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.13%

NULV

1D
1.26%
1M
4.63%
6M
12.43%
YTD
17.82%
1Y
28.40%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$320.07K$400.60K$268.48K
$3.37M$3.36M$3.64M

NULC vs. NULV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
16.79%16.29%18.71%22.54%-20.18%25.69%22.51%6.17%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
17.82%16.31%11.88%7.60%-10.09%23.46%1.87%16.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NULC and NULV is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.83

The correlation between NULC and NULV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

NULC vs. NULV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NULC
NULV

Technology

40.7%
25.1%

Financial Services

12.4%
17.4%

Healthcare

9.9%
13.7%

Industrials

9.0%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
1.6%

Communication Services

6.7%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
9.1%

Energy

2.1%
3.4%

Utilities

2.0%
4.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
3.2%

Basic Materials

1.5%
3.0%

Technology

NULC
40.7%
NULV
25.1%

Financial Services

NULC
12.4%
NULV
17.4%

Healthcare

NULC
9.9%
NULV
13.7%

Industrials

NULC
9.0%
NULV
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

NULC
7.5%
NULV
1.6%

Communication Services

NULC
6.7%
NULV
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

NULC
6.3%
NULV
9.1%

Energy

NULC
2.1%
NULV
3.4%

Utilities

NULC
2.0%
NULV
4.3%

Real Estate

NULC
2.0%
NULV
3.2%

Basic Materials

NULC
1.5%
NULV
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULC vs. NULV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NULC
NULC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NULC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NULC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NULC vs. NULV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NULCNULVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.47

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.92

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.27

15.84

-5.57

NULC vs. NULV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULC Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the NULV Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULC and NULV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NULC vs. NULV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULC drawdown since its inception was -34.86%, smaller than the maximum NULV drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULC and NULV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULCNULVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.86%

-36.99%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-7.28%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.53%

-15.07%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

-21.47%

-6.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-4.91%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.80%

+0.43%

Volatility

NULC vs. NULV - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) at 3.18%. This indicates that NULC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NULV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULCNULVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.18%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

8.24%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.63%

10.96%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

14.29%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

16.93%

+2.96%

NULC vs. NULV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NULV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NULC vs. NULV - Dividend Comparison

NULC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, more than NULV's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
8.71%10.17%1.86%1.32%2.37%6.14%4.07%0.77%0.00%0.00%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.39%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULC and NULV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NULC has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to NULV (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULC dropped -34.86% vs NULV's -36.99%.

On 5-year performance, NULC leads with 10.75% vs 9.50% for NULV. On fees, NULC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NULC has performed better with a 10.75% return vs 9.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NULV.

NULC has the higher dividend yield at 8.71%, compared with 1.39% for NULV.

NULC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NULV is Large Cap Value Equities. NULC tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap, while NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NULC and 0.26% for NULV.

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULC and NULV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer