NUKZ vs. USNG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. NUKZ is passively managed, while USNG is actively managed. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 28.33% vs 47.43% for USNG. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUKZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for USNG.

Performance

NUKZ vs. USNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than USNG's 36.17% return.

NUKZ

• 1D: -2.63%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 9.01%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USNG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 36.17%
• 6M: 36.35%
• 1Y: 47.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKZ vs. USNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	9.01%	36.71%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	36.17%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and USNG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025	0.48

NUKZ vs. USNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NUKZ	USNG
Industrials	46.5%	12.8%
Utilities	35.4%	4.7%
Energy	11.8%	79.2%
Basic Materials	4.7%	1.4%
Technology	1.6%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. USNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 29
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 91
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 86
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. USNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUKZ	USNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	2.86	-1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	3.85	-2.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.48	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	6.99	-5.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	21.05	-16.93

NUKZ vs. USNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the USNG Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and USNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. USNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, which is greater than USNG's maximum drawdown of -6.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and USNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKZ	USNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.03%	-6.82%	-26.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.51%	-6.82%	-9.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.20%	-0.64%	-8.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-1.52%	-4.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.91%	2.26%	+4.65%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. USNG - Volatility Comparison

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) at 6.29%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUKZ	USNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.93%	6.29%	+4.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.18%	12.47%	+10.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.61%	16.68%	+13.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.89%	16.61%	+16.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.89%	16.61%	+16.28%

NUKZ vs. USNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than USNG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKZ vs. USNG - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than USNG's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.84%	0.91%	0.09%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.09%	1.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKZ and USNG in my portfolio?

NUKZ and USNG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUKZ or USNG?

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to USNG (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs USNG's -6.82%.

Which ETF is better, NUKZ or USNG?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 47.43% vs 28.33% for NUKZ. On fees, USNG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, USNG has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUKZ or USNG?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 47.43% return vs 28.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUKZ or USNG?

USNG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUKZ or USNG?

USNG has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.84% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between NUKZ and USNG?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NUKZ and 0.59% for USNG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.