NUKZ vs. MU
NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 5.48% vs 657.80% for MU. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NUKZ vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 203.41% return.
NUKZ
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -11.94%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 43.65%
MU
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- 6M
- 138.72%
- YTD
- 203.41%
- 1Y
- 657.80%
- 3Y*
- 137.11%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- 52.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.23%
NUKZ vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | -1.84% | 56.57% | 60.11% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 203.41% | 240.24% | -3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKZ and MU is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKZ vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
NUKZ
MU
NUKZ vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUKZ | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.66 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 21.93 | -21.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | 74.09 | -73.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUKZ vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKZ | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -98.25% | +65.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.23% | -30.28% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.23% | -28.67% | +10.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -58.05% | +51.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 8.95% | -1.12% |
Volatility
NUKZ vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) is 6.47%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 30.97%. This indicates that NUKZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKZ | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 30.97% | -24.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.01% | 63.14% | -40.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.55% | 76.55% | -46.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 55.01% | -22.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 50.78% | -18.13% |
Dividends
NUKZ vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than MU's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.93% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKZ and MU have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (30.97%) compared to NUKZ (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.69 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUKZ and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer