NUKZ vs. GXPE

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - NUKZ tracks the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index while GXPE tracks the MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. NUKZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.

Performance

NUKZ vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a -1.21% return, which is significantly lower than GXPE's 28.48% return.

NUKZ

• 1D: -2.49%
• 1M: -10.26%
• 6M: -10.97%
• YTD: -1.21%
• 1Y: 9.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXPE

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 4.22%
• 6M: 20.71%
• YTD: 28.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKZ vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	-1.21%	10.19%
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF	28.48%	4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and GXPE is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 16
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 15
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

GXPE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUKZ	GXPE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.26	—	—

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and GXPE.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKZ	GXPE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.03%	-15.73%	-17.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.71%	-8.79%	-8.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.26%	-4.21%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.67%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NUKZ	GXPE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.59%	20.77%	+9.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.70%	20.77%	+11.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.70%	20.77%	+11.93%

NUKZ vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKZ vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than GXPE's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF	2.17%	1.20%	0.00%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.92%	0.91%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKZ and GXPE in my portfolio?

NUKZ and GXPE have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NUKZ or GXPE?

On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUKZ or GXPE?

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUKZ or GXPE?

GXPE has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.92% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between NUKZ and GXPE?

NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NUKZ and 0.15% for GXPE.