NUKZ vs. FSPCX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and FSPCX (Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio) are both funds - NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while FSPCX is a Financials Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 28.77% vs -0.58% for FSPCX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUKZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FSPCX.

Performance

NUKZ vs. FSPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than FSPCX's -0.79% return.

NUKZ

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -1.03%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 4.81%
• 1Y: 28.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSPCX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: -0.79%
• 6M: -0.60%
• 1Y: -0.58%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 11.71%
• 10Y*: 12.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKZ vs. FSPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	7.57%	56.57%	60.11%
FSPCX Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio	-0.79%	3.45%	21.29%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and FSPCX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024	0.12

The correlation between NUKZ and FSPCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. FSPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 31
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FSPCX

FSPCX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FSPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FSPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FSPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FSPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FSPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. FSPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUKZ	FSPCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	-0.01	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	0.10	+1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.01	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	-0.01	+1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	-0.03	+4.14

NUKZ vs. FSPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the FSPCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and FSPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. FSPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum FSPCX drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and FSPCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKZ	FSPCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.03%	-69.48%	+36.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.51%	-9.98%	-6.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.39%	-5.50%	-4.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.06%	-9.70%	+3.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.80%	4.98%	+1.82%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. FSPCX - Volatility Comparison

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX) at 5.74%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUKZ	FSPCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.24%	5.74%	+5.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.34%	11.31%	+12.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.46%	15.53%	+14.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.94%	17.59%	+15.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.94%	20.12%	+12.82%

NUKZ vs. FSPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPCX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKZ vs. FSPCX - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than FSPCX's 4.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPCX Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio	4.74%	3.35%	8.72%	8.48%	0.74%	8.40%	8.80%	6.90%	32.69%	12.52%	2.81%	3.11%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.85%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKZ and FSPCX in my portfolio?

NUKZ and FSPCX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUKZ or FSPCX?

NUKZ has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to FSPCX (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs FSPCX's -69.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.