PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUKZ vs. ESPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUKZ vs. ESPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than ESPR's -14.86% return.


NUKZ

1D
1.59%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
7.57%
6M
4.81%
1Y
27.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESPR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.96%
YTD
-14.86%
6M
-18.18%
1Y
162.50%
3Y*
35.36%
5Y*
-34.62%
10Y*
-14.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKZ vs. ESPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
7.57%56.57%60.11%
ESPR
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
-14.86%68.18%3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and ESPR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. ESPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ
NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPR
ESPR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ESPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. ESPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUKZESPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.36

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

3.07

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.11

7.68

-3.57

NUKZ vs. ESPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the ESPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and ESPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. ESPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum ESPR drawdown of -99.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and ESPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUKZESPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.03%

-99.37%

+66.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.51%

-53.19%

+36.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.39%

-97.27%

+86.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-69.99%

+63.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.80%

21.30%

-14.50%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. ESPR - Volatility Comparison

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR) at 1.06%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUKZESPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

1.06%

+10.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.34%

61.44%

-38.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.46%

92.66%

-62.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.94%

91.79%

-58.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.94%

84.61%

-51.67%

Dividends

NUKZ vs. ESPR - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while ESPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ESPR
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.85%0.91%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUKZ and ESPR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUKZ has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to ESPR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs ESPR's -99.37%.

ESPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUKZ and ESPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer