NUKZ vs. ARKF
NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while ARKF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK. NUKZ is passively managed, while ARKF is actively managed. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 27.91% vs -11.87% for ARKF. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NUKZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKF.
Performance
NUKZ vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than ARKF's -18.31% return.
NUKZ
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 27.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -18.31%
- 6M
- -21.31%
- 1Y
- -11.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.06%
- 10Y*
- —
NUKZ vs. ARKF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 7.57% | 56.57% | 60.11% |
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | -18.31% | 28.67% | 44.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKZ and ARKF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between NUKZ and ARKF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
NUKZ vs. ARKF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUKZ
ARKF
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
NUKZ
ARKF
-
Utilities
NUKZ
ARKF
-
Energy
NUKZ
ARKF
-
Basic Materials
NUKZ
ARKF
-
Technology
NUKZ
ARKF
Communication Services
NUKZ
-
ARKF
Consumer Cyclical
NUKZ
-
ARKF
Consumer Defensive
NUKZ
-
ARKF
-
Financial Services
NUKZ
-
ARKF
Healthcare
NUKZ
-
ARKF
Real Estate
NUKZ
-
ARKF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKZ vs. ARKF — Risk / Return Rank
NUKZ
ARKF
NUKZ vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUKZ | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.97 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | -0.31 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | -0.57 | +4.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUKZ vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum ARKF drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and ARKF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKZ | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -78.63% | +45.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.51% | -38.50% | +21.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.39% | -38.77% | +28.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -34.95% | +28.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 21.00% | -14.20% |
Volatility
NUKZ vs. ARKF - Volatility Comparison
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) at 10.36%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKZ | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 10.36% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.34% | 25.14% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.46% | 33.69% | -3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.94% | 42.87% | -9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.94% | 39.77% | -6.83% |
NUKZ vs. ARKF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUKZ vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison
NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than ARKF's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.25% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKZ and ARKF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUKZ has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to ARKF (10.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs ARKF's -78.63%.
On 1-year performance, NUKZ leads with 27.91% vs -11.87% for ARKF. On fees, ARKF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ARKF has been the lower-risk option at 10.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NUKZ has performed better with a 27.91% return vs -11.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.
NUKZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.11% for ARKF.
NUKZ is categorized as Energy Equities, while ARKF is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NUKZ and 0.75% for ARKF.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUKZ and ARKF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer