NUKX vs. ENFR
NUKX (Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUKX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas Wealth, while ENFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. NUKX is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Their -0.29 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NUKX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
NUKX vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NUKX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- YTD
- 28.27%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 26.80%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.27M | $3.93M | $3.16M | |
| $132.47K | $169.16K | $262.73K |
NUKX vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF | -22.51% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 6.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKX and ENFR is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKX vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
NUKX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ENFR
NUKX vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUKX | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUKX vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKX drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKX and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKX | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.95% | -68.28% | +36.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.73% | -2.57% | -26.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.27% | -15.83% | +2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility
NUKX vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKX | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.22% | 15.24% | +33.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.22% | 19.19% | +30.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.22% | 24.65% | +24.57% |
NUKX vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUKX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUKX vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
NUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than ENFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.91% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF | 6.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKX and ENFR have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUKX.
NUKX has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 3.91% for ENFR.
NUKX is categorized as Derivative Income, while ENFR is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NUKX and 0.35% for ENFR.
Find the right allocation for NUKX and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer