NUKX vs. IBID
NUKX (Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUKX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas Wealth, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. NUKX is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Their -0.29 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NUKX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
NUKX vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NUKX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IBID
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $730.73K | $757.79K | $746.53K | |
| $132.47K | $169.16K | $262.73K |
NUKX vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF | -22.51% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 1.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKX and IBID is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKX vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
NUKX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBID
NUKX vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUKX | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.74 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 25.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUKX vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKX drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKX and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKX | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.95% | -1.28% | -30.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.73% | -0.09% | -28.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.27% | -0.22% | -13.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility
NUKX vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKX | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.22% | 1.22% | +48.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.22% | 2.21% | +47.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.22% | 2.21% | +47.01% |
NUKX vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUKX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUKX vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
NUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than IBID's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 4.90% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% |
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF | 6.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKX and IBID have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUKX.
NUKX has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 4.90% for IBID.
NUKX is categorized as Derivative Income, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NUKX and 0.10% for IBID.
Find the right allocation for NUKX and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer