NUKX vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NUKX (Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - NUKX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas Wealth, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. NUKX is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. NUKX charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.

Performance

NUKX vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NUKX

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -22.65%
• YTD: 50.21%
• 6M: 47.81%
• 1Y: 38.79%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 17.15%
• 10Y*: 11.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKX vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	-11.18%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	13.93%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKX and BNO is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026	-0.38

Return for Risk

NUKX vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 29
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKX vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUKX	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.95	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.49	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.33	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.21	—

Drawdowns

NUKX vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKX drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKX and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKX	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.54%	-87.06%	+60.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-29.25%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.31%	-29.25%	+10.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.98%	-40.10%	+31.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NUKX	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	37.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.36%	41.67%	+10.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.36%	35.65%	+16.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.36%	36.68%	+15.68%

NUKX vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKX vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

NUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKX and BNO in my portfolio?

NUKX and BNO have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NUKX or BNO?

On fees, BNO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUKX or BNO?

BNO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUKX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUKX or BNO?

NUKX has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between NUKX and BNO?

NUKX is categorized as Derivative Income, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NUKX and 1.00% for BNO.