PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUGT vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUGT vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUGT achieves a -16.05% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, NUGT has underperformed SPUU with an annualized return of -8.54%, while SPUU has yielded a comparatively higher 24.77% annualized return.


NUGT

1D
-6.64%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
-16.05%
6M
-6.29%
1Y
97.46%
3Y*
60.96%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
-8.54%

SPUU

1D
-1.27%
1M
10.01%
YTD
19.82%
6M
19.11%
1Y
53.61%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
24.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUGT vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
-16.05%425.05%2.89%2.60%-32.10%-26.31%-60.16%100.73%-44.52%3.73%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
19.82%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NUGT and SPUU is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.15

The correlation between NUGT and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NUGT vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUGT
SPUU

Basic Materials

100.0%
0.7%

Communication Services

-

4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Industrials

-

3.3%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

16.5%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Basic Materials

NUGT
100.0%
SPUU
0.7%

Communication Services

NUGT

-

SPUU
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NUGT

-

SPUU
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

NUGT

-

SPUU
2.0%

Energy

NUGT

-

SPUU
1.4%

Financial Services

NUGT

-

SPUU
4.8%

Healthcare

NUGT

-

SPUU
3.6%

Industrials

NUGT

-

SPUU
3.3%

Real Estate

NUGT

-

SPUU
0.8%

Technology

NUGT

-

SPUU
16.5%

Utilities

NUGT

-

SPUU
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUGT vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUGT vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUGTSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.96

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

13.06

-8.88

NUGT vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUGT and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUGTSPUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.26

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.61

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

0.69

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

0.63

-0.97

Drawdowns

NUGT vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUGT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGT and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUGTSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-59.35%

-40.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.58%

-18.19%

-35.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.58%

-35.18%

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

-46.59%

-27.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

-59.35%

-37.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.80%

-1.27%

-98.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.52%

-9.51%

-82.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.39%

4.12%

+19.27%

Volatility

NUGT vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) has a higher volatility of 30.32% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.71%. This indicates that NUGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUGTSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.32%

5.71%

+24.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.18%

18.09%

+57.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.01%

23.90%

+66.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.96%

33.46%

+38.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.90%

35.77%

+52.13%

NUGT vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUGT has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUGT vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SPUU's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
0.36%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUGT and SPUU have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUGT has higher volatility (30.32%) compared to SPUU (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGT dropped -99.97% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.77% vs -8.54% for NUGT. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.77% return vs -8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for NUGT.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.36% for NUGT.

NUGT tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (300%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.23% for NUGT and 0.64% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUGT and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer