PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUGT vs. JNUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUGT vs. JNUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUGT achieves a -39.52% return, which is significantly higher than JNUG's -45.63% return. Over the past 10 years, NUGT has outperformed JNUG with an annualized return of -16.18%, while JNUG has yielded a comparatively lower -32.42% annualized return.


NUGT

1D
-6.72%
1M
-12.05%
6M
-48.02%
YTD
-39.52%
1Y
49.33%
3Y*
49.26%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
-16.18%
ALL TIME*
-33.84%

JNUG

1D
-7.15%
1M
-15.90%
6M
-52.25%
YTD
-45.63%
1Y
55.90%
3Y*
52.37%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
-32.42%
ALL TIME*
-36.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.40M$38.00M$44.93M
$66.79M$70.57M$87.96M

NUGT vs. JNUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
-39.52%425.05%2.89%2.60%-32.10%-26.31%-60.16%100.73%-44.52%3.73%
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
-45.63%478.59%9.96%-4.79%-43.60%-46.61%-85.51%82.43%-48.11%-20.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NUGT and JNUG is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013

0.96

The correlation between NUGT and JNUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUGT vs. JNUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUGT
JNUG

Basic Materials

100.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

NUGT
100.0%
JNUG
100.0%

Communication Services

NUGT

-

JNUG

-

Consumer Cyclical

NUGT

-

JNUG

-

Consumer Defensive

NUGT

-

JNUG

-

Energy

NUGT

-

JNUG

-

Financial Services

NUGT

-

JNUG

-

Healthcare

NUGT

-

JNUG

-

Industrials

NUGT

-

JNUG

-

Real Estate

NUGT

-

JNUG

-

Technology

NUGT

-

JNUG

-

Utilities

NUGT

-

JNUG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUGT vs. JNUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

JNUG
JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUGT vs. JNUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUGTJNUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

0.85

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

1.67

-0.06

NUGT vs. JNUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the JNUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUGT and JNUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUGT vs. JNUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUGT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, roughly equal to the maximum JNUG drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGT and JNUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUGTJNUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-99.95%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.40%

-70.58%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.40%

-70.58%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

-76.67%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.89%

-99.66%

+2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.86%

-99.70%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.59%

-93.93%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.61%

35.99%

-2.38%

Volatility

NUGT vs. JNUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) is 24.98%, while Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) has a volatility of 29.49%. This indicates that NUGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUGTJNUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.98%

29.49%

-4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.05%

90.25%

-10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.01%

107.20%

-11.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.62%

82.38%

-8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.38%

105.73%

-18.35%

NUGT vs. JNUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUGT has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than JNUG's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUGT vs. JNUG - Dividend Comparison

NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than JNUG's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
2.62%1.04%2.01%1.62%0.00%0.52%0.10%0.46%0.06%0.51%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
0.65%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, NUGT and JNUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JNUG has higher volatility (29.49%) compared to NUGT (24.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGT dropped -99.97% vs JNUG's -99.95%.

On 10-year performance, NUGT leads with -16.18% vs -32.42% for JNUG. On fees, JNUG is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, NUGT has been the lower-risk option at 24.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NUGT has performed better with a -16.18% return vs -32.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JNUG is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.65% for NUGT.

NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%), while JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.13% for NUGT and 1.03% for JNUG.

NUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUGT and JNUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer