PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUGT vs. GDXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUGT vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUGT achieves a -24.93% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -54.87% return.


NUGT

1D
-2.62%
1M
-11.13%
YTD
-24.93%
6M
-32.67%
1Y
82.75%
3Y*
60.93%
5Y*
19.48%
10Y*
-10.74%

GDXU

1D
-3.77%
1M
-22.15%
YTD
-54.87%
6M
-61.87%
1Y
47.73%
3Y*
45.15%
5Y*
-8.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUGT vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
-24.93%425.05%2.89%2.60%-32.10%-26.31%0.14%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
-54.87%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NUGT and GDXU is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.99

The correlation between NUGT and GDXU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUGT vs. GDXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUGT
GDXU

Basic Materials

100.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

NUGT
100.0%
GDXU
100.0%

Communication Services

NUGT

-

GDXU

-

Consumer Cyclical

NUGT

-

GDXU

-

Consumer Defensive

NUGT

-

GDXU

-

Energy

NUGT

-

GDXU

-

Financial Services

NUGT

-

GDXU

-

Healthcare

NUGT

-

GDXU

-

Industrials

NUGT

-

GDXU

-

Real Estate

NUGT

-

GDXU

-

Technology

NUGT

-

GDXU

-

Utilities

NUGT

-

GDXU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUGT vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUGT vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUGTGDXUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

0.57

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.16

1.20

+1.96

NUGT vs. GDXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the GDXU Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUGT and GDXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUGT vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUGT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than GDXU's maximum drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGT and GDXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUGTGDXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-94.39%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.43%

-83.97%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.43%

-83.97%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

-91.30%

+17.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.82%

-79.05%

-20.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.53%

-69.79%

-21.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.25%

39.79%

-13.54%

Volatility

NUGT vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) is 33.85%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 53.36%. This indicates that NUGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUGTGDXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.85%

53.36%

-19.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

79.75%

125.48%

-45.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.97%

143.87%

-49.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.81%

112.23%

-39.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.09%

111.12%

-23.03%

NUGT vs. GDXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUGT has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUGT vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison

NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
0.40%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, NUGT and GDXU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GDXU has higher volatility (53.36%) compared to NUGT (33.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGT dropped -99.97% vs GDXU's -94.39%.

On 5-year performance, NUGT leads with 19.48% vs -8.03% for GDXU. On fees, GDXU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NUGT has been the lower-risk option at 33.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUGT has performed better with a 19.48% return vs -8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDXU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.

NUGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.

NUGT is categorized as Gold, while GDXU is Leveraged Equities. NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%), while GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for NUGT and 0.95% for GDXU.

NUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUGT and GDXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer