NUGT vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NUGT is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NUGT returned 60.96%/yr vs 19.20%/yr for QTJL. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUGT charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

NUGT vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUGT achieves a -16.05% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.15% return.

NUGT

• 1D: -6.64%
• 1M: -4.13%
• YTD: -16.05%
• 6M: -6.29%
• 1Y: 97.46%
• 3Y*: 60.96%
• 5Y*: 16.32%
• 10Y*: -8.54%

QTJL

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 19.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUGT vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares	-16.05%	425.05%	2.89%	2.60%	-32.10%	-11.83%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.15%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NUGT and QTJL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.21

NUGT vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NUGT	QTJL
Basic Materials	100.0%	1.2%
Communication Services	-	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.6%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	54.2%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

NUGT vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUGT

NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 32
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 34
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 29

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 68
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUGT vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NUGT	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	2.06	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	2.93	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.42	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	3.08	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.18	16.23	-12.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NUGT vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUGT and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NUGT	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	2.06	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	0.52	-0.85

Drawdowns

NUGT vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUGT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGT and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUGT	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.97%	-33.40%	-66.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.58%	-6.68%	-46.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.58%	-22.43%	-31.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.80%	-0.01%	-99.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-91.52%	-7.94%	-83.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.39%	1.27%	+22.12%

Volatility

NUGT vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) has a higher volatility of 30.32% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that NUGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUGT	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.32%	0.31%	+30.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	75.18%	7.61%	+67.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.01%	10.01%	+80.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.96%	20.42%	+51.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	87.90%	20.42%	+67.48%

NUGT vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUGT has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUGT vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares	0.36%	0.22%	1.79%	1.67%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.63%	0.57%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUGT and QTJL in my portfolio?

NUGT and QTJL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUGT or QTJL?

NUGT has higher volatility (30.32%) compared to QTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGT dropped -99.97% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, NUGT or QTJL?

On 3-year performance, NUGT leads with 60.96% vs 19.20% for QTJL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUGT or QTJL?

Over the 3-year period, NUGT has performed better with a 60.96% return vs 19.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUGT or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for NUGT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUGT or QTJL?

NUGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between NUGT and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for NUGT and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.