NUGT vs. BAR
NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both Gold funds - NUGT tracks the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%) while BAR tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUGT returned 17.04%/yr vs 18.08%/yr for BAR. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NUGT charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.
Performance
NUGT vs. BAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUGT achieves a -32.09% return, which is significantly lower than BAR's -4.82% return.
NUGT
- 1D
- -9.53%
- 1M
- -19.60%
- YTD
- -32.09%
- 6M
- -39.03%
- 1Y
- 60.88%
- 3Y*
- 55.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.04%
- 10Y*
- -11.63%
BAR
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -8.92%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- 21.40%
- 3Y*
- 28.63%
- 5Y*
- 18.08%
- 10Y*
- —
NUGT vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -32.09% | 425.05% | 2.89% | 2.60% | -32.10% | -26.31% | -60.16% | 100.73% | -44.52% | -15.42% |
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | -4.82% | 64.12% | 26.97% | 12.96% | -0.55% | -3.92% | 25.02% | 18.16% | -1.87% | -0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUGT and BAR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between NUGT and BAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUGT vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank
NUGT
BAR
NUGT vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUGT | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.88 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.30 | 2.37 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUGT vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUGT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -24.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGT and BAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUGT | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -24.38% | -75.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.43% | -24.38% | -39.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.43% | -24.38% | -39.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.72% | -24.38% | -49.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.84% | -23.93% | -75.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.53% | -6.53% | -85.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.52% | 9.07% | +17.45% |
Volatility
NUGT vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) has a higher volatility of 35.11% compared to GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) at 8.11%. This indicates that NUGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUGT | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.11% | 8.11% | +27.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.35% | 24.24% | +56.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.31% | 27.39% | +66.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.94% | 18.14% | +54.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.97% | 16.54% | +71.43% |
NUGT vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUGT has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUGT vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison
NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.44% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUGT and BAR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUGT has higher volatility (35.11%) compared to BAR (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGT dropped -99.97% vs BAR's -24.38%.
On 5-year performance, BAR leads with 18.08% vs 17.04% for NUGT. On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BAR has been the lower-risk option at 8.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BAR has performed better with a 18.08% return vs 17.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.
NUGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.
NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%), while BAR tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for NUGT and 0.17% for BAR.
BAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUGT and BAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer