NUEM vs. TJUN
NUEM (Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - NUEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG Emerging Markets, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NUEM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
NUEM vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUEM achieves a 19.14% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 5.26% return.
NUEM
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 19.14%
- 6M
- 21.09%
- 1Y
- 42.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- —
TJUN
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUEM vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NUEM Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 19.14% | 14.60% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 5.26% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUEM and TJUN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUEM vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
NUEM
TJUN
NUEM vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUEM | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUEM | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 2.48 | -2.08 |
Drawdowns
NUEM vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUEM and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUEM | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.48% | -4.47% | -35.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.00% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.02% | -0.60% | -14.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | — | — |
Volatility
NUEM vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUEM | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.68% | 7.54% | +11.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 7.54% | +12.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 7.54% | +12.64% |
NUEM vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUEM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUEM vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
NUEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUEM Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 3.00% | 3.58% | 1.95% | 2.37% | 1.90% | 2.45% | 1.26% | 1.98% | 2.05% | 0.62% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUEM and TJUN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NUEM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NUEM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
NUEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
NUEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NUEM and 0.95% for TJUN.
Find the right allocation for NUEM and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer