PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUEM vs. SCHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUEM vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUEM achieves a 19.14% return, which is significantly higher than SCHE's 11.88% return.


NUEM

1D
-1.30%
1M
3.53%
YTD
19.14%
6M
21.09%
1Y
42.42%
3Y*
19.13%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*

SCHE

1D
-1.45%
1M
2.69%
YTD
11.88%
6M
12.88%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUEM vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
19.14%27.12%9.73%8.57%-19.74%-1.08%24.09%16.67%-17.26%18.50%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
11.88%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%20.31%-13.57%15.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NUEM and SCHE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.90

The correlation between NUEM and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUEM vs. SCHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUEM
SCHE

Technology

31.5%
30.8%

Financial Services

18.2%
13.6%

Industrials

11.9%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
8.9%

Basic Materials

8.5%
3.9%

Communication Services

8.2%
5.2%

Energy

3.3%
3.1%

Healthcare

2.9%
2.8%

Utilities

1.9%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.0%

Technology

NUEM
31.5%
SCHE
30.8%

Financial Services

NUEM
18.2%
SCHE
13.6%

Industrials

NUEM
11.9%
SCHE
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

NUEM
11.3%
SCHE
8.9%

Basic Materials

NUEM
8.5%
SCHE
3.9%

Communication Services

NUEM
8.2%
SCHE
5.2%

Energy

NUEM
3.3%
SCHE
3.1%

Healthcare

NUEM
2.9%
SCHE
2.8%

Utilities

NUEM
1.9%
SCHE
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

NUEM
1.6%
SCHE
2.0%

Real Estate

NUEM
0.7%
SCHE
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUEM vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUEM
NUEM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NUEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NUEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUEM vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUEMSCHEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

2.72

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

9.82

+3.13

NUEM vs. SCHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the SCHE Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUEM and SCHE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUEMSCHEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

1.89

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.28

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.25

+0.16

Drawdowns

NUEM vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, which is greater than SCHE's maximum drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUEM and SCHE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUEMSCHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-36.20%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-11.29%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-17.08%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.10%

-33.59%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.45%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-12.60%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.12%

+0.16%

Volatility

NUEM vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) at 5.80%. This indicates that NUEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUEMSCHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

5.80%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

13.58%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.68%

16.26%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

17.67%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

19.46%

+0.72%

NUEM vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUEM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUEM vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison

NUEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than SCHE's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.00%3.58%1.95%2.37%1.90%2.45%1.26%1.98%2.05%0.62%0.00%0.00%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.57%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NUEM and SCHE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NUEM has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to SCHE (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUEM dropped -39.48% vs SCHE's -36.20%.

On 5-year performance, NUEM leads with 5.39% vs 4.94% for SCHE. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUEM has performed better with a 5.39% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NUEM.

NUEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 2.57% for SCHE.

NUEM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG Emerging Markets, while SCHE tracks FTSE All-World Emerging. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NUEM and 0.11% for SCHE.

NUEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUEM and SCHE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer