PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUEM vs. NULG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUEM vs. NULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUEM achieves a 17.71% return, which is significantly higher than NULG's 16.76% return.


NUEM

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.89%
YTD
17.71%
6M
19.16%
1Y
38.91%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*

NULG

1D
-0.39%
1M
8.41%
YTD
16.76%
6M
15.85%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
24.67%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUEM vs. NULG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
17.71%27.12%9.73%8.57%-19.74%-1.08%24.09%16.67%-17.26%18.50%
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
16.76%14.07%23.75%42.71%-28.43%28.06%39.58%39.23%0.31%10.08%

Correlation

The correlation between NUEM and NULG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.59

The correlation between NUEM and NULG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUEM vs. NULG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUEM
NULG

Technology

31.5%
56.5%

Financial Services

18.2%
7.1%

Industrials

11.9%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
9.8%

Basic Materials

8.5%
1.9%

Communication Services

8.2%
6.5%

Energy

3.3%

-

Healthcare

2.9%
5.5%

Utilities

1.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.2%

Technology

NUEM
31.5%
NULG
56.5%

Financial Services

NUEM
18.2%
NULG
7.1%

Industrials

NUEM
11.9%
NULG
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NUEM
11.3%
NULG
9.8%

Basic Materials

NUEM
8.5%
NULG
1.9%

Communication Services

NUEM
8.2%
NULG
6.5%

Energy

NUEM
3.3%
NULG

-

Healthcare

NUEM
2.9%
NULG
5.5%

Utilities

NUEM
1.9%
NULG

-

Consumer Defensive

NUEM
1.6%
NULG
2.1%

Real Estate

NUEM
0.7%
NULG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUEM vs. NULG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUEM
NUEM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NUEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NUEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NULG
NULG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUEM vs. NULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUEMNULGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

1.83

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

6.22

+5.64

NUEM vs. NULG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the NULG Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUEM and NULG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUEMNULGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.56

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.68

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.90

-0.49

Drawdowns

NUEM vs. NULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, which is greater than NULG's maximum drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUEM and NULG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUEMNULGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-36.17%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-14.50%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-22.28%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.10%

-36.17%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-0.99%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-6.84%

-8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

4.26%

-0.97%

Volatility

NUEM vs. NULG - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) at 4.80%. This indicates that NUEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NULG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUEMNULGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

4.80%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.88%

13.55%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

17.01%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

21.51%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

21.39%

-1.21%

NUEM vs. NULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUEM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than NULG's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUEM vs. NULG - Dividend Comparison

NUEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than NULG's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.04%3.58%1.95%2.37%1.90%2.45%1.26%1.98%2.05%0.62%
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.10%0.11%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.68%1.10%3.73%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUEM and NULG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUEM has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to NULG (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUEM dropped -39.48% vs NULG's -36.17%.

On 5-year performance, NULG leads with 14.66% vs 5.14% for NUEM. On fees, NULG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NULG has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NULG has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NUEM.

NUEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.

NUEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NULG is Large Cap Growth Equities. NUEM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG Emerging Markets, while NULG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NUEM and 0.25% for NULG.

NUEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUEM and NULG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer