NUCG.L vs. TSCO.L
NUCG.L (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while TSCO.L (Tesco PLC) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, NUCG.L returned 36.37%/yr vs 28.84%/yr for TSCO.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NUCG.L vs. TSCO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NUCG.L is traded in USD, while TSCO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TSCO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUCG.L achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than TSCO.L's 8.86% return.
NUCG.L
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -10.44%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 36.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSCO.L
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 28.84%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.39%
NUCG.L vs. TSCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 2.96% | 56.10% | 31.89% | 0.05% |
TSCO.L Tesco PLC | 8.86% | 33.84% | 29.58% | 26.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUCG.L and TSCO.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUCG.L vs. TSCO.L — Risk / Return Rank
NUCG.L
TSCO.L
NUCG.L vs. TSCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and Tesco PLC (TSCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUCG.L | TSCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.19 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 1.80 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 4.52 | -2.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUCG.L vs. TSCO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUCG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum TSCO.L drawdown of -74.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUCG.L and TSCO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUCG.L | TSCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -74.47% | +39.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.65% | -12.57% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.35% | -18.60% | -16.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.00% | -4.25% | -16.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.55% | -44.23% | +33.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.10% | 5.01% | +7.09% |
Volatility
NUCG.L vs. TSCO.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) has a higher volatility of 12.56% compared to Tesco PLC (TSCO.L) at 7.39%. This indicates that NUCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUCG.L | TSCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.56% | 7.39% | +5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.37% | 17.39% | +10.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.94% | 22.26% | +17.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.38% | 22.36% | +12.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.38% | 24.97% | +9.41% |
Dividends
NUCG.L vs. TSCO.L - Dividend Comparison
NUCG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSCO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSCO.L Tesco PLC | 3.07% | 3.23% | 3.39% | 3.75% | 5.15% | 20.72% | 4.19% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUCG.L and TSCO.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NUCG.L and TSCO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer