PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L).

HMCA.L and XDUS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HMCA.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jul 27, 2018. XDUS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on May 9, 2014. Both HMCA.L and XDUS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HMCA.L
HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF		0.59%17.38%13.48%-18.58%-17.12%4.17%39.06%30.18%-12.02%
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C		-3.32%9.21%27.38%20.65%-10.42%28.96%16.52%26.57%-8.67%
Different Trading Currencies

HMCA.L is traded in GBP, while XDUS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDUS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMCA.L achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than XDUS.L's -3.32% return.

HMCA.L

1D
0.42%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
0.59%
6M
2.28%
1Y
22.06%
3Y*
2.23%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
—

XDUS.L

1D
1.63%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
14.59%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF

Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with HMCA.L:
HMCA.L vs. BCHS.LHMCA.L vs. NUCG.LHMCA.L vs. HERG.LHMCA.L vs. UC04.LHMCA.L vs. LYPG.DEHMCA.L vs. CNYAHMCA.L vs. SPX5.L
Often compared with XDUS.L:
XDUS.L vs. EUSAXDUS.L vs. GPSA.LXDUS.L vs. CU1.LXDUS.L vs. XNAQ.LXDUS.L vs. HMUS.LXDUS.L vs. XWD1.DEXDUS.L vs. XZMD.L

HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMCA.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDUS.L's 0.07% expense ratio.

HMCA.L
HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C

Return for Risk

HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HMCA.L
HMCA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HMCA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMCA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMCA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HMCA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMCA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
XDUS.L
XDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HMCA.LXDUS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

0.93

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

1.36

+0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.93

+1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.29

6.54

+1.75

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMCA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMCA.L and XDUS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HMCA.LXDUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

0.93

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.83

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.96

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

1.00

-0.77

Correlation

The correlation between HMCA.L and XDUS.L is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L - Dividend Comparison

HMCA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while XDUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HMCA.L
HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF		1.85%1.76%1.97%2.20%1.76%1.09%0.88%1.78%0.29%
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMCA.L drawdown since its inception was -44.23%, which is greater than XDUS.L's maximum drawdown of -25.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCA.L and XDUS.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HMCA.LXDUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.23%

-25.82%

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-10.82%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

-21.51%

-20.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-25.82%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.96%

-5.14%

-11.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.09%

-3.64%

-14.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.21%

+0.51%

Volatility

HMCA.L vs. XDUS.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) at 3.83%. This indicates that HMCA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HMCA.LXDUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

3.83%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

8.50%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

15.70%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

14.73%

+6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.00%

16.38%

+6.62%