NUAG vs. USFI
NUAG (Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and USFI (BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUAG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond, while USFI is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by BrandywineGLOBAL. NUAG is passively managed, while USFI is actively managed. Over the past year, NUAG returned 4.81% vs 5.51% for USFI. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NUAG charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for USFI.
Performance
NUAG vs. USFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUAG achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than USFI's 0.97% return.
NUAG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
USFI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUAG vs. USFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.43% | 7.37% | 2.02% | 4.15% |
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF | 0.97% | 6.96% | 1.11% | 2.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUAG and USFI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between NUAG and USFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUAG vs. USFI — Risk / Return Rank
NUAG
USFI
NUAG vs. USFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUAG | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 5.17 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 12.51 | -7.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUAG vs. USFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUAG drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, which is greater than USFI's maximum drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUAG and USFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUAG | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.79% | -8.47% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.54% | -1.07% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.60% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -2.08% | -2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.44% | +0.46% |
Volatility
NUAG vs. USFI - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) at 0.88%. This indicates that NUAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUAG | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 0.88% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 1.61% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 3.26% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 6.89% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.47% | 6.89% | -1.42% |
NUAG vs. USFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUAG has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than USFI's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUAG vs. USFI - Dividend Comparison
NUAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than USFI's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.43% | 4.44% | 3.95% | 3.60% | 2.27% | 2.93% | 3.54% | 3.79% | 3.38% | 0.48% |
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF | 4.44% | 4.42% | 4.60% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUAG and USFI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUAG has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to USFI (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUAG dropped -19.79% vs USFI's -8.47%.
On 1-year performance, USFI leads with 5.51% vs 4.81% for NUAG. On fees, NUAG is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, USFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USFI has performed better with a 5.51% return vs 4.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUAG is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for USFI.
NUAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 4.44% for USFI.
NUAG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while USFI is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and BrandywineGLOBAL. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NUAG and 0.39% for USFI.
USFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUAG and USFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer