PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUAG vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUAG vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUAG achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.46% return.


NUAG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.69%
6M
0.77%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*

BND

1D
0.03%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUAG vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.69%7.37%2.02%7.52%-13.97%-2.03%7.48%10.13%-1.45%3.98%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.46%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NUAG and BND is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.86

The correlation between NUAG and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.97 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUAG vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUAG
NUAG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
NUAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NUAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUAG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUAG vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUAGBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

1.38

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

2.07

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.85

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.13

5.66

+1.47

NUAG vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUAG and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUAGBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.38

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.03

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.59

-0.27

Drawdowns

NUAG vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUAG drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUAG and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUAGBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.79%

-18.58%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

-2.68%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.61%

-5.92%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.19%

-17.91%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-2.18%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-3.06%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.88%

-0.05%

Volatility

NUAG vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) is 1.17%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that NUAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUAGBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

1.26%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

2.68%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

3.78%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

6.02%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.49%

5.53%

-0.04%

NUAG vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUAG has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NUAG vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

NUAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than BND's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.49%4.43%4.44%3.95%3.60%2.27%2.93%3.54%3.79%3.38%0.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, NUAG and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BND has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to NUAG (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUAG dropped -19.79% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 5-year performance, NUAG leads with 0.58% vs 0.20% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUAG has performed better with a 0.58% return vs 0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for NUAG.

NUAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 3.96% for BND.

NUAG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while BND is Total Bond Market. NUAG tracks ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NUAG and 0.03% for BND.

NUAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUAG and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer