NUAG vs. JBND
NUAG (Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and JBND (Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. NUAG is passively managed, while JBND is actively managed. Over the past year, NUAG returned 6.10% vs 5.68% for JBND. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NUAG charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JBND.
Performance
NUAG vs. JBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUAG achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly higher than JBND's 0.22% return.
NUAG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
JBND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUAG vs. JBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.69% | 7.37% | 2.02% | 8.34% |
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF | 0.22% | 8.21% | 3.19% | 7.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUAG and JBND is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between NUAG and JBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUAG vs. JBND — Risk / Return Rank
NUAG
JBND
NUAG vs. JBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUAG | JBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 1.49 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 2.23 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 1.94 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 5.97 | +1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUAG | JBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.49 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.53 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
NUAG vs. JBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUAG drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, which is greater than JBND's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUAG and JBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUAG | JBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.79% | -4.48% | -15.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.54% | -2.94% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -1.74% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -1.15% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.95% | -0.12% |
Volatility
NUAG vs. JBND - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) have volatilities of 1.17% and 1.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUAG | JBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 1.20% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | 2.67% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58% | 3.82% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 4.84% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.49% | 4.84% | +0.65% |
NUAG vs. JBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUAG has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JBND's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUAG vs. JBND - Dividend Comparison
NUAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than JBND's 4.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF | 4.41% | 4.42% | 4.58% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.49% | 4.43% | 4.44% | 3.95% | 3.60% | 2.27% | 2.93% | 3.54% | 3.79% | 3.38% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, NUAG and JBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JBND has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to NUAG (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUAG dropped -19.79% vs JBND's -4.48%.
On 1-year performance, NUAG leads with 6.10% vs 5.68% for JBND. On fees, NUAG is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NUAG has performed better with a 6.10% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUAG is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JBND.
NUAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 4.41% for JBND.
They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NUAG and 0.30% for JBND.
NUAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUAG and JBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer