PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUAG vs. NPFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUAG vs. NPFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUAG achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than NPFI's 1.68% return.


NUAG

1D
0.17%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.67%
6M
0.70%
1Y
5.51%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*

NPFI

1D
0.06%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.68%
6M
2.17%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUAG vs. NPFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.67%7.37%2.71%
NPFI
Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF
1.68%9.21%6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between NUAG and NPFI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUAG vs. NPFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUAG
NUAG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NUAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NUAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUAG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

NPFI
NPFI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NPFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPFI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NPFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUAG vs. NPFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUAGNPFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.63

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.45

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

11.83

-5.25

NUAG vs. NPFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the NPFI Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUAG and NPFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUAGNPFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

2.68

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

2.66

-2.34

Drawdowns

NUAG vs. NPFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUAG drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, which is greater than NPFI's maximum drawdown of -3.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUAG and NPFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUAGNPFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.79%

-3.18%

-16.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

-3.18%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.06%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-0.34%

-4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.66%

+0.18%

Volatility

NUAG vs. NPFI - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) at 0.75%. This indicates that NUAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NPFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUAGNPFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

0.75%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

2.53%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

2.91%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

2.95%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.48%

2.95%

+2.53%

NUAG vs. NPFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUAG has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NPFI's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUAG vs. NPFI - Dividend Comparison

NUAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than NPFI's 6.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NPFI
Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF
6.40%6.33%5.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.49%4.43%4.44%3.95%3.60%2.27%2.93%3.54%3.79%3.38%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUAG and NPFI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUAG has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to NPFI (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUAG dropped -19.79% vs NPFI's -3.18%.

On 1-year performance, NPFI leads with 7.77% vs 5.51% for NUAG. On fees, NUAG is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, NPFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NPFI has performed better with a 7.77% return vs 5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUAG is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NPFI.

NPFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 4.49% for NUAG.

NUAG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while NPFI is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NUAG and 0.55% for NPFI.

NPFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUAG and NPFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer