PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSX vs. NTSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSX vs. NTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than NTSI's 7.18% return.


NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*

NTSI

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.92%
YTD
7.18%
6M
8.77%
1Y
20.90%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSX vs. NTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%14.23%
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
7.18%30.37%1.11%15.42%-19.27%1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSX and NTSI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.73

The correlation between NTSX and NTSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

NTSX vs. NTSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NTSX
NTSI

Technology

35.1%
10.6%

Communication Services

12.5%
4.7%

Financial Services

12.3%
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
10.5%

Industrials

7.7%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
7.4%

Energy

3.5%
4.8%

Utilities

2.1%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.4%
6.7%

Technology

NTSX
35.1%
NTSI
10.6%

Communication Services

NTSX
12.5%
NTSI
4.7%

Financial Services

NTSX
12.3%
NTSI
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

NTSX
10.1%
NTSI
8.1%

Healthcare

NTSX
8.4%
NTSI
10.5%

Industrials

NTSX
7.7%
NTSI
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

NTSX
5.5%
NTSI
7.4%

Energy

NTSX
3.5%
NTSI
4.8%

Utilities

NTSX
2.1%
NTSI
3.2%

Real Estate

NTSX
1.5%
NTSI
1.5%

Basic Materials

NTSX
1.4%
NTSI
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSX vs. NTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSI
NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSX vs. NTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSXNTSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.70

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

6.22

+6.03

NTSX vs. NTSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the NTSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSX and NTSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSXNTSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.41

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.36

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.38

+0.33

Drawdowns

NTSX vs. NTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum NTSI drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and NTSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSXNTSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-34.01%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-12.33%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-13.69%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

-34.01%

+2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-2.36%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-9.19%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

3.37%

-1.30%

Volatility

NTSX vs. NTSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is 3.39%, while WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that NTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSXNTSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

4.84%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

12.60%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

14.95%

-2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

15.68%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

15.63%

+2.64%

NTSX vs. NTSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSI's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NTSX vs. NTSI - Dividend Comparison

NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than NTSI's 3.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
3.51%3.65%2.92%2.35%2.66%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSX and NTSI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSI has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs NTSI's -34.01%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.69% vs 5.55% for NTSI. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NTSI.

NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while NTSI is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.26% for NTSI.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSX and NTSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer