NSRIX vs. NOEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund (NSRIX) and Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX).
NSRIX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Mar 4, 2008. NOEMX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Apr 24, 2006.
Performance
NSRIX vs. NOEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NSRIX vs. NOEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSRIX Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund | -4.47% | 21.03% | 17.02% | 25.44% | -19.45% | 24.60% | 15.49% | 28.29% | -7.65% | 21.21% |
NOEMX Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund | 2.41% | 33.67% | 7.10% | 9.20% | -20.53% | -3.36% | 17.63% | 18.32% | -15.04% | 37.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSRIX achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than NOEMX's 2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, NSRIX has outperformed NOEMX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while NOEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.71% annualized return.
NSRIX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
NOEMX
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -10.05%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 31.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NSRIX vs. NOEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSRIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than NOEMX's 0.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NSRIX vs. NOEMX — Risk / Return Rank
NSRIX
NOEMX
NSRIX vs. NOEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund (NSRIX) and Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NSRIX | NOEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.89 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 2.52 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.37 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.09 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | 7.91 | -2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NSRIX | NOEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.89 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.21 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.45 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.21 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between NSRIX and NOEMX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NSRIX vs. NOEMX - Dividend Comparison
NSRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than NOEMX's 2.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSRIX Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund | 5.92% | 5.66% | 5.55% | 1.57% | 1.90% | 5.26% | 1.62% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 3.14% | 3.46% | 3.79% |
NOEMX Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund | 2.47% | 2.53% | 2.98% | 3.86% | 2.42% | 2.87% | 2.36% | 3.24% | 2.76% | 1.74% | 1.92% | 2.54% |
Drawdowns
NSRIX vs. NOEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSRIX drawdown since its inception was -55.30%, smaller than the maximum NOEMX drawdown of -66.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSRIX and NOEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSRIX | NOEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.30% | -66.67% | +11.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.97% | -13.06% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.86% | -37.28% | +9.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.66% | -39.49% | +5.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -11.81% | +4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -19.16% | +10.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.59% | -0.64% |
Volatility
NSRIX vs. NOEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund (NSRIX) is 5.96%, while Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that NSRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NSRIX | NOEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 7.56% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 12.09% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 17.35% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 16.10% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 17.41% | -0.32% |