PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOEMX vs. NOINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOEMX vs. NOINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) and Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOEMX achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly higher than NOINX's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, NOEMX has underperformed NOINX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while NOINX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.54% annualized return.


NOEMX

1D
3.34%
1M
-0.97%
6M
10.87%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
36.05%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
8.70%
ALL TIME*
5.24%

NOINX

1D
-0.66%
1M
1.34%
6M
5.98%
YTD
12.01%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
9.54%
ALL TIME*
6.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NOEMX vs. NOINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOEMX
Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
19.50%33.67%7.10%9.20%-20.53%-3.36%17.63%18.32%-15.04%37.34%
NOINX
Northern International Equity Index Fund
12.01%31.86%3.69%18.08%-14.24%11.08%7.92%21.98%-13.76%25.28%

Correlation

The correlation between NOEMX and NOINX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2006

0.76

The correlation between NOEMX and NOINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOEMX vs. NOINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NOEMX
NOEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NOEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NOEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

NOINX
NOINX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NOINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOINX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NOINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOINX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NOEMX vs. NOINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) and Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOEMXNOINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.19

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

8.11

-0.07

NOEMX vs. NOINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the NOINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOEMX and NOINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOEMX vs. NOINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOEMX drawdown since its inception was -66.67%, which is greater than NOINX's maximum drawdown of -61.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOEMX and NOINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOEMXNOINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.67%

-61.10%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-11.12%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-13.73%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.60%

-29.34%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.49%

-33.69%

-5.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.30%

-0.66%

-7.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-12.49%

-6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

2.99%

+1.38%

Volatility

NOEMX vs. NOINX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to Northern International Equity Index Fund (NOINX) at 4.71%. This indicates that NOEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOEMXNOINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.03%

4.71%

+5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.45%

14.41%

+5.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.19%

16.56%

+4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

16.19%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

16.26%

+1.68%

NOEMX vs. NOINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOEMX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than NOINX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NOEMX vs. NOINX - Dividend Comparison

NOEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than NOINX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOEMX
Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.12%2.53%2.98%3.86%2.42%2.87%2.36%3.24%2.76%1.74%1.92%2.54%
NOINX
Northern International Equity Index Fund
3.19%3.57%3.70%3.37%2.71%3.19%2.04%3.08%3.47%2.45%3.21%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOEMX and NOINX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOEMX has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to NOINX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOEMX dropped -66.67% vs NOINX's -61.10%.

NOEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOEMX and NOINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer