PortfoliosLab logo
NOEMX vs. EEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NOEMX and EEM is -0.40. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

NOEMX vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

NOEMX:

3.15%

EEM:

12.01%

Max Drawdown

NOEMX:

-0.59%

EEM:

-1.61%

Current Drawdown

NOEMX:

-0.42%

EEM:

-0.95%

Returns By Period


NOEMX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

EEM

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NOEMX vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOEMX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.68% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOEMX vs. EEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOEMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOEMX is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOEMX is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOEMX is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOEMX is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOEMX is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOEMX is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

EEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEM is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEM is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEM is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEM is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEM is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEM is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NOEMX vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

NOEMX vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

NOEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than EEM's 2.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NOEMX
Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NOEMX vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOEMX drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOEMX and EEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NOEMX vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...