PortfoliosLab logo
NOEMX vs. EEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NOEMX and EEM is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

NOEMX vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NOEMX:

0.68

EEM:

0.55

Sortino Ratio

NOEMX:

0.82

EEM:

0.77

Omega Ratio

NOEMX:

1.11

EEM:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

NOEMX:

0.33

EEM:

0.31

Martin Ratio

NOEMX:

1.62

EEM:

1.40

Ulcer Index

NOEMX:

5.39%

EEM:

6.05%

Daily Std Dev

NOEMX:

16.76%

EEM:

19.27%

Max Drawdown

NOEMX:

-67.25%

EEM:

-66.43%

Current Drawdown

NOEMX:

-12.90%

EEM:

-13.82%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NOEMX having a 8.53% return and EEM slightly higher at 8.85%. Over the past 10 years, NOEMX has outperformed EEM with an annualized return of 3.48%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively lower 3.28% annualized return.


NOEMX

YTD

8.53%

1M

3.60%

6M

7.78%

1Y

11.35%

3Y*

4.70%

5Y*

6.39%

10Y*

3.48%

EEM

YTD

8.85%

1M

4.02%

6M

7.00%

1Y

10.45%

3Y*

4.75%

5Y*

6.11%

10Y*

3.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

NOEMX vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOEMX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.68% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOEMX vs. EEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOEMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOEMX is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOEMX is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOEMX is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOEMX is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOEMX is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOEMX is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

EEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEM is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEM is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEM is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEM is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEM is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEM is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NOEMX vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NOEMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOEMX and EEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NOEMX vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

NOEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than EEM's 2.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NOEMX
Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.75%2.98%3.87%2.42%2.87%2.36%3.24%2.77%1.74%1.92%2.54%2.73%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.23%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%2.23%

Drawdowns

NOEMX vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOEMX drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, roughly equal to the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOEMX and EEM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NOEMX vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) is 3.77%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that NOEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...