NSRIX vs. RODM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NSRIX (Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both funds - NSRIX is a Global Equities fund managed by Northern Funds, while RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Over the past 10 years, NSRIX returned 13.01%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for RODM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.

Performance

NSRIX vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund (NSRIX) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSRIX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NSRIX has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 13.01%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.

NSRIX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 4.58%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 11.72%
• 1Y: 27.19%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: 11.86%
• 10Y*: 13.01%

RODM

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 11.24%
• 6M: 14.32%
• 1Y: 24.65%
• 3Y*: 20.51%
• 5Y*: 9.81%
• 10Y*: 8.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSRIX vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NSRIX Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund	10.10%	21.03%	17.02%	25.44%	-19.45%	24.60%	15.49%	28.29%	-7.65%	21.21%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	11.24%	34.42%	8.02%	15.76%	-14.54%	11.11%	-0.62%	17.15%	-9.97%	25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between NSRIX and RODM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015	0.76

The correlation between NSRIX and RODM shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NSRIX vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSRIX

NSRIX Risk / Return Rank: 57
NSRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
NSRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
NSRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NSRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
NSRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 71
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSRIX vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund (NSRIX) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NSRIX	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.31	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.23	-0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	3.66	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.68	14.77	-2.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NSRIX vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSRIX and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NSRIX	RODM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	2.31	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.73	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.59	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.52	-0.06

Drawdowns

NSRIX vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSRIX drawdown since its inception was -55.30%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSRIX and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NSRIX	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.30%	-35.98%	-19.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.36%	-7.10%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.58%	-10.58%	-7.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.86%	-28.85%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.66%	-35.98%	+2.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.20%	+1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.45%	-6.38%	-2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	1.76%	+0.56%

Volatility

NSRIX vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund (NSRIX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.30%. This indicates that NSRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NSRIX	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	3.30%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	8.42%	+1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.83%	10.78%	+2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.46%	13.43%	+3.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.13%	15.24%	+1.89%

NSRIX vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NSRIX and RODM have an expense ratio of 0.29%.

Dividends

NSRIX vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

NSRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than RODM's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NSRIX Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund	5.14%	5.66%	5.55%	1.57%	1.90%	5.26%	1.62%	2.70%	3.46%	3.14%	3.46%	3.79%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.79%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NSRIX and RODM in my portfolio?

NSRIX and RODM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NSRIX or RODM?

NSRIX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to RODM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSRIX dropped -55.30% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.