NSRIX vs. NMFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund (NSRIX) and Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX).
NSRIX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Mar 4, 2008. NMFIX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Sep 17, 2012.
Performance
NSRIX vs. NMFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NSRIX vs. NMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSRIX Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund | -4.47% | 21.03% | 17.02% | 25.44% | -19.45% | 24.60% | 15.49% | 28.29% | -7.65% | 21.21% |
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 7.82% | 23.11% | 1.74% | 6.62% | -7.21% | 13.68% | -2.59% | 24.34% | -10.26% | 22.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSRIX achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than NMFIX's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, NSRIX has outperformed NMFIX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while NMFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.63% annualized return.
NSRIX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
NMFIX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 23.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NSRIX vs. NMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSRIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NMFIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NSRIX vs. NMFIX — Risk / Return Rank
NSRIX
NMFIX
NSRIX vs. NMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund (NSRIX) and Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NSRIX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.66 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 2.35 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 3.16 | -1.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | 12.53 | -7.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NSRIX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.66 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.59 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.50 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.52 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between NSRIX and NMFIX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NSRIX vs. NMFIX - Dividend Comparison
NSRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than NMFIX's 5.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSRIX Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund | 5.92% | 5.66% | 5.55% | 1.57% | 1.90% | 5.26% | 1.62% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 3.14% | 3.46% | 3.79% |
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 5.63% | 6.03% | 3.82% | 2.78% | 3.98% | 10.13% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 10.33% | 7.71% | 2.53% | 2.01% |
Drawdowns
NSRIX vs. NMFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSRIX drawdown since its inception was -55.30%, which is greater than NMFIX's maximum drawdown of -34.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSRIX and NMFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSRIX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.30% | -34.93% | -20.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.97% | -7.81% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.86% | -22.76% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.66% | -34.93% | +1.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -4.84% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -5.34% | -3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.97% | +0.98% |
Volatility
NSRIX vs. NMFIX - Volatility Comparison
Northern Global Sustainability Index Fund (NSRIX) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) at 4.02%. This indicates that NSRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NSRIX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 4.02% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 10.46% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 14.55% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 13.73% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 15.44% | +1.65% |