NRSH vs. MGC
Compare and contrast key facts about Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC).
NRSH and MGC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NRSH is a passively managed fund by Aztlan that tracks the performance of the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. It was launched on Nov 29, 2023. MGC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both NRSH and MGC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NRSH vs. MGC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NRSH vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 8.58% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 8.65% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | -4.86% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 4.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRSH achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's -4.86% return.
NRSH
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 8.58%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- 1Y
- 24.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MGC
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- -4.86%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 18.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NRSH vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRSH has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NRSH vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank
NRSH
MGC
NRSH vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRSH | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.01 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.56 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.64 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 7.19 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRSH | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.01 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.56 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between NRSH and MGC is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NRSH vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison
NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than MGC's 1.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.38% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 1.01% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
NRSH vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRSH drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRSH and MGC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRSH | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -51.93% | +27.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -11.93% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -6.33% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.94% | -7.12% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 2.72% | +1.04% |
Volatility
NRSH vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) at 5.54%. This indicates that NRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NRSH | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.78% | 5.54% | +5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.81% | 9.86% | +8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.79% | 18.80% | +5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 17.26% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 18.19% | +2.62% |