NRGU vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NRGU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NRGU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

NRGU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGU achieves a 157.14% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 259.95% return.

NRGU

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: 51.26%
• 6M: 91.25%
• YTD: 157.14%
• 1Y: 166.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 50.40%

LINT

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -47.53%
• 6M: 154.25%
• YTD: 259.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.47M	$20.67M	$35.74M
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	$4.57M	$4.13M	$3.95M

NRGU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	157.14%	-14.23%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	259.95%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGU and LINT is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	-0.06

NRGU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NRGU	LINT
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NRGU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 75
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 69
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 63

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NRGU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRGU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.59	—	—

Drawdowns

NRGU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRGU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.50%	-69.02%	+11.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.31%	-62.88%	+51.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.74%	-23.85%	-1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NRGU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.83%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.33%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.39%	169.51%	-92.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.47%	169.51%	-81.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.47%	169.51%	-81.04%

NRGU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRGU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.76%	0.25%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRGU and LINT in my portfolio?

NRGU and LINT have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NRGU or LINT?

On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRGU or LINT?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRGU or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between NRGU and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGU and 0.97% for LINT.