NRGD vs. GDXD
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD).
NRGD and GDXD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NRGD is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019. GDXD is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%). It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. Both NRGD and GDXD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NRGD vs. GDXD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NRGD vs. GDXD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -69.03% | -32.37% |
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -51.34% | -95.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -69.03% return, which is significantly lower than GDXD's -51.34% return.
NRGD
- 1D
- 5.43%
- 1M
- -38.99%
- YTD
- -69.03%
- 6M
- -68.32%
- 1Y
- -79.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXD
- 1D
- -21.63%
- 1M
- 68.00%
- YTD
- -51.34%
- 6M
- -76.21%
- 1Y
- -96.70%
- 3Y*
- -84.06%
- 5Y*
- -75.49%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NRGD vs. GDXD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NRGD and GDXD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
NRGD vs. GDXD — Risk / Return Rank
NRGD
GDXD
NRGD vs. GDXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRGD | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | -0.70 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | -2.54 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.73 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.98 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | -1.20 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRGD | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | -0.70 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.87 | -0.68 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between NRGD and GDXD is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NRGD vs. GDXD - Dividend Comparison
Neither NRGD nor GDXD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NRGD vs. GDXD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -89.38%, smaller than the maximum GDXD drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and GDXD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRGD | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.38% | -99.96% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.38% | -98.51% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.63% | -99.93% | +11.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.41% | -70.92% | +16.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 61.18% | 80.64% | -19.46% |
Volatility
NRGD vs. GDXD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) is 19.52%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a volatility of 54.68%. This indicates that NRGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NRGD | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.52% | 54.68% | -35.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.19% | 110.83% | -60.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.75% | 138.20% | -49.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.55% | 108.13% | -20.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.55% | 108.21% | -20.66% |