PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGD vs. BERZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NRGD vs. BERZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NRGD vs. BERZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -69.03% return, which is significantly lower than BERZ's 19.74% return.


NRGD

1D
5.43%
1M
-38.99%
YTD
-69.03%
6M
-68.32%
1Y
-79.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BERZ

1D
-14.87%
1M
7.73%
YTD
19.74%
6M
-4.91%
1Y
-79.02%
3Y*
-70.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NRGD vs. BERZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NRGD and BERZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

NRGD vs. BERZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGD
NRGD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NRGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BERZ
BERZ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BERZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BERZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BERZ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BERZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BERZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGD vs. BERZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRGDBERZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.89

-0.84

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.86

-1.52

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.81

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.88

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-1.00

-0.31

NRGD vs. BERZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is comparable to the BERZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGD and BERZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRGDBERZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

-0.84

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.87

-0.66

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between NRGD and BERZ is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NRGD vs. BERZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither NRGD nor BERZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NRGD vs. BERZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -89.38%, smaller than the maximum BERZ drawdown of -99.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and BERZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGDBERZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.38%

-99.46%

+10.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.38%

-89.01%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.63%

-99.28%

+10.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.41%

-70.50%

+16.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.18%

78.74%

-17.56%

Volatility

NRGD vs. BERZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) is 19.52%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a volatility of 29.36%. This indicates that NRGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BERZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NRGDBERZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.52%

29.36%

-9.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.19%

61.12%

-10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.75%

94.14%

-5.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.55%

92.55%

-5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.55%

92.55%

-5.00%