PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRG vs. RMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NRG vs. RMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NRG having a -19.30% return and RMD slightly lower at -19.39%. Over the past 10 years, NRG has outperformed RMD with an annualized return of 26.54%, while RMD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.71% annualized return.


NRG

1D
-1.15%
1M
-7.53%
YTD
-19.30%
6M
-21.70%
1Y
-17.17%
3Y*
58.56%
5Y*
31.87%
10Y*
26.54%

RMD

1D
-1.48%
1M
-6.31%
YTD
-19.39%
6M
-22.35%
1Y
-22.67%
3Y*
-2.34%
5Y*
-0.97%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRG vs. RMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
-19.30%78.91%78.58%69.36%-23.47%18.54%-2.14%0.69%39.59%133.69%
RMD
ResMed Inc.
-19.39%6.26%34.18%-16.55%-19.47%23.41%38.33%37.85%36.38%39.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NRG and RMD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2003

0.25

The correlation between NRG and RMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NRG:

$1.21

RMD:

$13.78

PE Ratio

NRG:

105.45

RMD:

14.02

PEG Ratio

NRG:

1.58

RMD:

0.43

PS Ratio

NRG:

0.78

RMD:

3.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

NRG:

$32.38B

RMD:

$5.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NRG:

$4.69B

RMD:

$3.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

NRG:

$2.57B

RMD:

$2.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRG vs. RMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRG
NRG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRG Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

RMD
RMD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
RMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMD Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRG vs. RMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRGRMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.85

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

-0.61

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-1.42

+0.11

NRG vs. RMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is higher than the RMD Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRG and RMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRGRMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

-0.95

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

-0.03

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.44

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.52

-0.16

Drawdowns

NRG vs. RMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRG drawdown since its inception was -79.41%, which is greater than RMD's maximum drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRG and RMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGRMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.41%

-61.61%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.57%

-37.28%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.57%

-40.09%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.62%

-53.99%

+21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.76%

-53.99%

+5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.39%

-33.74%

+3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.00%

-15.98%

-12.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.14%

15.95%

-2.81%

Volatility

NRG vs. RMD - Volatility Comparison

NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a higher volatility of 13.75% compared to ResMed Inc. (RMD) at 10.44%. This indicates that NRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGRMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.75%

10.44%

+3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.40%

19.50%

+14.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.45%

23.97%

+20.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.91%

31.12%

+8.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.24%

31.55%

+7.69%

Dividends

NRG vs. RMD - Dividend Comparison

NRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than RMD's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
1.43%1.11%1.81%2.92%4.40%3.02%3.20%0.30%0.30%0.42%1.92%4.93%
RMD
ResMed Inc.
1.24%0.94%0.88%1.07%0.83%0.62%0.73%0.98%1.26%1.61%2.03%2.16%

Financials

NRG vs. RMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NRG Energy, Inc. and ResMed Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
10.26B
1.43B
(NRG) Total Revenue
(RMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NRG vs. RMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NRG Energy, Inc. and ResMed Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
62.3%
Portfolio components
NRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 10.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.

NRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 328.00M and revenue of 10.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

RMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

NRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 125.00M and revenue of 10.26B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.

RMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NRG and RMD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRG has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to RMD (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRG dropped -79.41% vs RMD's -61.61%.

NRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRG and RMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer