PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NQCFX vs. IRLNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NQCFX vs. IRLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQCFX achieves a 18.73% return, which is significantly higher than IRLNX's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, NQCFX has underperformed IRLNX with an annualized return of 11.23%, while IRLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.08% annualized return.


NQCFX

1D
1.22%
1M
-0.59%
6M
13.75%
YTD
18.73%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
11.23%
ALL TIME*
6.58%

IRLNX

1D
2.15%
1M
-0.51%
6M
5.90%
YTD
2.58%
1Y
11.37%
3Y*
21.65%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
18.08%
ALL TIME*
17.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NQCFX vs. IRLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NQCFX
Northquest Capital Fund
18.73%10.85%7.08%27.28%-26.10%32.62%19.65%35.76%-2.05%14.23%
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
2.58%18.20%34.60%46.01%-30.06%30.63%38.32%35.61%-2.02%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NQCFX and IRLNX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009

0.86

The correlation between NQCFX and IRLNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (3 years) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NQCFX vs. IRLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NQCFX
NQCFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NQCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
NQCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IRLNX
IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NQCFX vs. IRLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NQCFXIRLNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.12

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

0.74

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

2.09

+4.92

NQCFX vs. IRLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the IRLNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQCFX and IRLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NQCFX vs. IRLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQCFX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than IRLNX's maximum drawdown of -32.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQCFX and IRLNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NQCFXIRLNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.46%

-32.90%

-64.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-16.64%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.46%

-23.31%

-74.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.46%

-32.90%

-64.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.46%

-32.90%

-64.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.17%

-6.57%

-89.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-4.75%

-10.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

5.66%

-2.28%

Volatility

NQCFX vs. IRLNX - Volatility Comparison

Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) have volatilities of 7.28% and 7.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NQCFXIRLNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

7.04%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.91%

14.93%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.67%

18.58%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,579.10%

22.36%

+1,556.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,116.65%

21.62%

+1,095.03%

NQCFX vs. IRLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQCFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IRLNX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

NQCFX vs. IRLNX - Dividend Comparison

NQCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than IRLNX's 20.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
20.13%9.54%3.55%4.60%11.22%0.83%4.18%4.95%3.70%0.99%1.23%1.14%
NQCFX
Northquest Capital Fund
1.29%1.53%0.00%0.97%1.13%6.41%11.55%3.07%6.04%0.00%0.00%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


NQCFX and IRLNX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NQCFX has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to IRLNX (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQCFX dropped -97.46% vs IRLNX's -32.90%.

NQCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NQCFX and IRLNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer