NQCFX vs. XLK

In the year-to-date period, NQCFX achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's -0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NQCFX has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 11.29%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 19.66% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NQCFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NQCFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQCFX and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NQCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than XLK's 0.67% yield.

The maximum NQCFX drawdown since its inception was -36.04%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQCFX and XLK.

The current volatility for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) is 4.90%, while Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that NQCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.