NPFI vs. PGF
NPFI (Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF) and PGF (Invesco Financial Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. NPFI is actively managed, while PGF is passively managed. Over the past year, NPFI returned 7.77% vs 4.11% for PGF. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NPFI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PGF.
Performance
NPFI vs. PGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NPFI achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than PGF's -0.24% return.
NPFI
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PGF
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- 2.30%
NPFI vs. PGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NPFI Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF | 1.68% | 9.21% | 6.56% |
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | -0.24% | 3.40% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between NPFI and PGF is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between NPFI and PGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NPFI vs. PGF — Risk / Return Rank
NPFI
PGF
NPFI vs. PGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) and Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NPFI | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.11 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.88 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.83 | 1.86 | +9.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NPFI | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 0.66 | +2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.66 | 0.15 | +2.50 |
Drawdowns
NPFI vs. PGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NPFI drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum PGF drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPFI and PGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NPFI | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -75.69% | +72.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -4.69% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -5.31% | +5.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -7.01% | +6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 2.21% | -1.55% |
Volatility
NPFI vs. PGF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) is 0.75%, while Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that NPFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NPFI | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 1.47% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | 4.06% | -1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 6.27% | -3.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.95% | 11.36% | -8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.95% | 12.00% | -9.05% |
NPFI vs. PGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NPFI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PGF's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
NPFI vs. PGF - Dividend Comparison
NPFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than PGF's 6.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPFI Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF | 6.40% | 6.33% | 5.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | 6.32% | 6.30% | 6.24% | 6.15% | 5.95% | 4.68% | 4.91% | 5.14% | 5.73% | 5.32% | 5.92% | 5.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NPFI and PGF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGF has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to NPFI (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NPFI dropped -3.18% vs PGF's -75.69%.
On 1-year performance, NPFI leads with 7.77% vs 4.11% for PGF. On fees, NPFI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, NPFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NPFI has performed better with a 7.77% return vs 4.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NPFI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PGF.
NPFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 6.32% for PGF.
They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NPFI and 0.62% for PGF.
NPFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NPFI and PGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer