PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NPFE vs. CNAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NPFE vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NPF Core Equity ETF (NPFE) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NPFE

1D
-1.98%
1M
0.05%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNAV

1D
-7.71%
1M
3.16%
YTD
34.15%
6M
33.13%
1Y
56.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NPFE vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
NPFE
NPF Core Equity ETF
6.29%
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
28.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NPFE and CNAV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NPFE vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NPFE

CNAV
CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NPFE vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NPF Core Equity ETF (NPFE) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NPFE vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NPFECNAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.91

1.29

+0.62

Drawdowns

NPFE vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPFE drawdown since its inception was -5.36%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPFE and CNAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NPFECNAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-30.06%

+24.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-8.90%

+6.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-5.42%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

Volatility

NPFE vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NPFECNAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

26.34%

-10.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

27.80%

-12.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

27.80%

-12.35%

NPFE vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPFE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

NPFE vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

Neither NPFE nor CNAV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NPFE and CNAV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NPFE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NPFE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

NPFE and CNAV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: NPF Investment Advisors and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for NPFE and 1.31% for CNAV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NPFE and CNAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer